Crack cocaine could be smoked, which produced a fast, intense high, and it was cheap and easy to make. While the use of coca leaves as an intoxicant dates back three thousand years, crack cocaine, a crystallized form of cocaine, was developed during the cocaine boom of the 1970s and its use spread in the mid1980s. How an early biden crime bill created the sentencing disparity for. Cocaine is a stimulant drug thats made from the leaves of the south american coca plant.
During supreme court oral argument yesterday on whether the law that reduced the disparity in crack powder cocaine sentencing should be applied to those already convicted, justice sonia sotomayor honed in on the discriminatory history that led to. Explain the crack powder cocaine sentencing disparity. Advocacy groups have formed the clemency project 2014 to recruit private attorneys to help, but that is creating its own sets of issues. The racial disparity associated with crack cocaine sentencing contributed to a negative. Miami was one of the first cities to experience a surge in cocaine use associated with crack cocaine. Many fewer crack cocaine offenders have been prosecuted annually since. The nations lawmakers took a step in that direction nine years ago when they passed the fair sentencing act, which reduced the disparity between powder cocaine and crack. Its simply a matter of what you cut it with, and how you take it.
However, crack cocaine convictions for possession in 1994 were handed primarily to blacks. Fair sentencing act american civil liberties union. The effect of crack cocaine addiction and age on the. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while distribution of 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same 5year mandatory minimum sentence. Narrowing the justice gap brennan center for justice. The disparity is highly controversial and often attributed to racial and economic bias rather than the relative harm of crack versus cocaine. Under the current law, crack users possessing only 5 grams of the drug are charged with a felony to get the same charge, powder cocaine users have to be caught with 500 grams. The new form of cocaine was called crack, and by the summer of 1986 it was fueling fears of a drug epidemic. Despite widespread popular accounts linking crack cocaine to innercity decay systematic research has analyzed the effect of the introduction of crack on urban. Crack epidemic united states history 1980s britannica. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a. In order to receive the same mandatory sentence for being in possession of crack vs. Crack epidemic, the significant increase in the use of crack cocaine, or crack, in the united states during the early 1980s.
That resulted in a disparity with powder of about 18 to 1. Because crack has a faster, more intense high, powder cocaine users may be attracted to crack cocaine and once used, crack addiction is very common. Jul 01, 2014 violence associated with crack stems from distribution in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Crack could also be smoked much more easily, requiring a temperature of only 194f to vaporize.
Thus, sentencing for crack cocaine users is much more severe than powder cocaine users. Sentencing guidelines show that 500 grams of powdered cocaine will put you away for the minimum of five years, where only 5 grams of crack cocaine can give you the same amount of years. Under the 2010 law, the amount of crack that triggers the fiveyear minimum is 28 grams of crack or 500 grams of powder, and, for the tenyear minimum, 280 grams of crack and 5,000 of powder. The law reduced the disparity between the amount of crack cocaine and powder cocaine needed to trigger certain united states federal criminal penalties from a. Congress reduced the disparity between powder cocaine and crack from 100 to 1 to 18 to 1 in 2010, but experts say that ratio has no basis in science and the network found it perpetuates the double standard for people convicted of crack offenses in the federal court system, who are overwhelmingly black. In fiscal year 2010, before the passage of the fair sentencing act, almost 4,000 defendants, mainly black, received. More than 80% of federal prisoners serving crack cocaine sentences are black. This resulted in a number of social consequences, such as increasing crime and violence in american inner city neighborhoods, as well as a resulting backlash in the form of tough on crime policies. May 18, 20 since congress recognized the gaping racial disparity between mandatory minimum sentences for crack offenses and cocaine offenses and reduced the ratio from 100to1 to 18to1, courts have.
It also brings crack sentencing in line with powder cocaine, as well as with all other drugs, by applying mandatory minimums only to dealers and not those convicted of simple possession. Does crack have a greater psychotropic effect per gram. The fair sentencing act amends existing laws by increasing the amounts of crack that trigger these penalties, from five grams to 28 grams for fiveyear minimum sentences and from 50 grams to 280 grams for tenyear minimum sentences. People used to taking cocaine would take an equivalent amount of crack and overdose, and hospital admissions due to cocaine overdose doubled in a year. A compromise bill awaiting house attention would reduce, but not get rid of the crack powder cocaine disparity. Use is highest in north america followed by europe and south america. According to a report published by the sentencing project about 23 of crack cocaine users are white or hispanic. Regardless of how many people use which drug and what the penalties are for doing so, the truth of the matter is that both. The history of cocaine shows that as drugrelated crime escalated dramatically, legal penalties for sales of cocaine and crack were increased, and u. It eliminates the disparity in federal sentencing for crack versus powder cocaine offenses, without a shift in the current powder cocaine penalty. The disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentencing has been the most notorious example of profound racial bias baked into our superficially neutral criminal laws. Crack cocaine was popularized because of its affordability, its immediate euphoric effect, and its high profitability. On tuesday, august 3, president obama signed into law a bill to reduce the vast disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine sentencing. In 2010 congress passed the fair sentencing act, which repealed the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession and reduced the sentencing disparity from 100.
Sentences for crack cocaine possession are now proportionate to sentences for powder cocaine. Now, the ten year sentence is triggered by 280 grams of crack instead of 50. After more than 20 years of sentencing with a 100to1 disparity a disparity put in place as a response to combating, what was then perceived, as the more harmful effects of crack cocaine on urban communities, legislation that reduces that disparity down to 18to1 is now headed to the desk of president of obama. The press did not begin reporting on the issue of crack cocaine until 1984, but those articles suggested that the mounting crack problem had existed prior to that time. Whether sold as crack or powder, used on the street or in a corporate penthouse, the penalty for cocaine use should be the same for. Nov 01, 2011 many inmates are being released starting tuesday, thanks to changes easing the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences. To our knowledge, this is the first study in brazil to compare crack users to cocaine snorters and other substance users. Cracking the racial disparity for cocaine sentencing center. In the 1980s, at the height of the war on drugs, congress approved tough.
The crack epidemic had particularly devastating effects. The effect of crack cocaine addiction and age on the microstructure and morphology of the human striatum and thalamus using shape analysis and fast diffusion kurtosis imaging. The crack epidemic the history of crack cocaine drug. Despite this history, the crack powder sentencing disparity would, over the next quarter century, become one of the lefts favorite examples of americas racist criminal justice system. Sociology 380 crime and deviance flashcards quizlet. Unjustified and unreasonable overview crack cocaine became prevalent in the mid1980s and received massive media attention due in part to the death of college basketball star len bias subsequently found to have used powder cocaine on the night of his death and not crack. Mistrust of police is highest where law enforcement is most needed. Crack cocaine could be obtained for the same price at purities of around 80 percent. Crack powder sentencing disparity reduced by congress. The profile of a typical crack user is an africanamerican man between the ages of 18 30 from a poor socioeconomic background.
The bill has passed the state senate and is currently. Obviously, no one is going to justify the disparity between crack and powder cocaine on racial grounds. The reason is because every branch of the united states government has said that the crack cocaine disparity targeted one race of people, mr. Jerry falwells moral majority and then pat robertsons christian. Our results show that crack cocaine users have more family problems than other substance users and describe what those problems are. The old 100to1 crack cocaine ratio has led to the mass incarceration of thousands of nonviolent prisoners under a law widely acknowledged as racially discriminatory. In the history of mexican americans, they were forcibly made part of the northern states in america. A couple of years ago, we wrote a column about crack cocaine, which ended with a discussion of the federal sentencing guidelines for crack vs. A comprehensive examination of the 100to1 crack versus powder cocaine sentencing disparity under which distribution of just 5 grams of crack carries a minimum 5year federal prisonsentence, while cracks in the system. Is there a difference in price, which the law is trying to compensate for.
Martin luther kings southern christian leadership conference discovered during the. Willie aikens on captivity, christianity, and crack cocaine. Drug sentencing and institutionalized discrimination. A complete history of crack cocaine drug rehab options. Nov 03, 2011 most notably, it intends to redress the disparity between the draconian sentences routinely meted out to users of crack cocaine, most of whom happen to be black, and the lenient sentences routinely meted out to users of powder cocaine, most of whom happen to be white. While the use of coca leaves as an intoxicant dates back three thousand years, crack cocaine, a crystallized form of cocaine, was developed during the cocaine boom of the 1970s and its use spread in the. Cocaine is the second most frequently used illegal drug globally, after cannabis. Critics say the sentencing disparity for the two types of cocaine is unfair and ends up giving harsher treatment to minorities. The crack epidemic in the united states was a surge of crack cocaine use in major cities across the united states between the early 1980s and the early 1990s. Many inmates are being released starting tuesday, thanks to. Why was the disparity recently reduced, and why were many people critical of it. New rules slashing crack cocaine sentences go into effect cnn.
The history books will be downright embarrassing when they talk about americas treatment of drug addicts, and the racial disparities in its approach to treatment. In a powerful statement about the troubling history of drug sentencing, sixth circuit judges gilbert merritt and boyce martin write. In early 1995, the united states sentencing commission examined the crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity. The christian community played an instrumental role in lobbying for the passage of the fair sentencing act many christians publicly condemned the crack powder cocaine sentencing disparity. Congress did a serious injustice when it imposed much tougher penalties on defendants convicted of selling the crack form of cocaine the kind most often used in impoverished, minority. Reform the crack powder cocaine mandatory minimum sentences to reflect a ratio of 1to1, rather than 18to1. Cocaine im working on a paper that deals with the disparity of crack vs. When teens were surveyed to find out why they started using drugs in the first place, 55% replied that. Although better, the disparity is still grossly disproportionate. Sale of as little as five grams of crack, barely a teaspoon, gets. Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in federal sentencing today a. Jul 28, 2010 congress on wednesday changed a quartercenturyold law that has subjected tens of thousands of blacks to long prison terms for crack cocaine convictions while giving far more lenient treatment to. Disparity related to crime history of crack douglas berman, law professor at ohio state university, talks with michele norris about how the disparity in sentencing minimums between crack and. A complete history of crack cocaine march 28, 2018 substance abuse 0 comments crack cocaine, commonly shortened to crack, is a free base version of cocaine a drug that has been used in various forms in south america for centuries.
A powerful series by investigative reporter gary webb of the san jose mercury news says the answer may be yesand the charge. The law placed the quantity of crack that triggered the laws five and 10year. Data show racial disparity in crack sentencing us news. Because crack and powder cocaine are two forms of the same drug, there should not be any disparity in sentencing between crack and powder cocaine offenses the only truly fair ratio is 1. The federal antidrug abuse act of 1986, part of the war on drugs, established a disparity between the amount of crack and. There have been numerous efforts in congress to make the fair sentencing act retroactive and to eliminate the 18to1 disparity. The manual of adolescent substance abuse treatment calls it the most addictive form of cocaine. The sharp difference originated in 1986, when crack was first. With further processing, crack cocaine can be produced from cocaine. Between 14 and 21 million people use the drug each year. In the mid 80s, congress passed the antidrug abuse act of 1986. The sentencing disparities between crack and cocaine attn.
The introduction of crack cocaine and the rise in urban crime rates jeff grogger, mike willis. Accounting for the discriminatory history of sentencing. Please join us in thanking congress for passing this historic piece of legislation. Disparity, discrimination, and adverse impacts fair sentencing is individualized sentencing. Did the cia play a role in launching the crack cocaine epidemic. It creates mandatory minimum sentences for drug trafficking crimes, including the especially harsh 100to1 crackpowder disparity. This disparity has often been called racist since it disproportionately imprisons blacks. Crack cocaine, also known simply as crack or rock, is a free base form of cocaine that can be smoked.
According to congress legislative history, the federal drug sentences. Us senator dick durbin has observed that, the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine has contributed to the imprisonment of african americans at six times the rate of whites. Now that disparity is being reduced from 100to1 to 18to1. Cracking the racial disparity for cocaine sentencing. Mistrust of police is highest where law enforcement is. Crack was cheap and effective for getting high, so it became very popular, especially among the middle class. The crack epidemic had particularly devastating effects within the african american communities of the inner cities by. The crack epidemic the history of crack cocaine drugfree. House holds hearings on crackpowder cocaine sentencing disparity. The amount of powder cocaine necessary to trigger the sentence is still five kilos. In 2010, congress passed the fair sentencing act fsa, which reduced the sentencing disparity between offenses for crack and powder cocaine from 100. Obama needs to fix the crack cocaine sentencing gap. Support fair and rational sentencing by eliminating the. All this occurred while crack cocaine use continued to decline.
The federal antidrug abuse act of 1986, part of the war on drugs, established a disparity between the amount of crack and powdered cocaine needed to trigger certain criminal penalties at a. Unwarranted disparity is defined as different treatment of individual offenders who are similar in relevant ways, or similar treatment of individual. What are the arguments in favor of the current 18to1 disparity in the law. Most disturbingly, because the majority of people arrested for crack offenses are african american. The report finds that over 88% of those sentenced for crack offenses are black, while only 4.
In the sentencing commissions report on the crack powder cocaine sentencing disparity released in february, it pointed to the racial impact of this law. Five grams of crack and 500 grams of powder cocaine now trigger a 5year mandatory minimum. Crackcocaine users show more family problems than other. Aug 03, 2010 data show racial disparity in crack sentencing congress passed the fair sentencing act to make punishments for crack and cocaine more equal. Crack cocaine was first introduced to the united states in the early 1980s, going on to become an epidemic with millions of users and contributing to. Crack cocaine became prevalent in the mid1980s and received massive media attention due in part to its exponential growth in the drug market. A person who is selling cocaine in the powdered form or crack form will both bring about a great deal of harm in the user. For years, eliminating this disparity has been a priority for the naacp, as the gap unfairly hurts communities of color. Thousands are stuck in prison just because of the date they were. Jul, 2015 the justice department is struggling to determine which sentences have been influenced by the crack powder cocaine sentencing disparity and it lacks the lawyers to make a significant dent in the backlog. The explosive popularity of crack cocaine was associated with its cheap price, which for the first time made cocaine available to a wider economic class. The 1986 law created a 100 to 1 disparity between the sentencing guidelines for crack and powder cocaine.
445 1320 109 1116 577 1315 947 1497 118 471 659 1372 833 1247 595 1458 1248 1634 1639 1589 319 1303 541 489 95 1230 1494 958 845 316 1427 508